UK-led Study Shows Metformin Offers No Strength Training Benefits for Seniors
LEXINGTON, Ky. (Oct. 22, 2019) – A new clinical trial initiated by University of Kentucky researchers argues against the hypothesis that the diabetes drug metformin could help exercising seniors gain more muscle mass. The double-blind trial, conducted at the University of Kentucky and University of Alabama at Birmingham, found that older adults who took metformin while performing rigorous resistance exercise training had smaller gains in muscle mass than the placebo group. The results of the trial were published in Aging Cell, Sept. 26.
Research shows that progressive resistance training can help older adults retain or build muscle mass. Those gains are variable among individuals, however, and chronic inflammation in the muscle may be a contributing factor in whether or not an individual can build muscle.
“Because metformin has anti-inflammatory properties, we thought it would be a logical candidate to study,” said Charlotte Peterson, Ph.D., professor in the UK College of Health Sciences and director of the Center for Muscle Biology.
Peterson and her colleagues responded to a request for proposals from the National Institutes of Health on metformin’s effects on age-related conditions, outside of its well-known anti-diabetic properties, to determine if metformin would supplement resistance training response.
“In older adults (age 65 and up) who have lost significant muscle mass and function over prior decades, we thought metformin might combat muscle inflammation and thereby boost the muscle regrowth response to resistance training,” said Marcas Bamman, Ph.D., professor in the UAB Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology and director of the UAB Center for Exercise Medicine. “Instead, metformin blunted the adaptations such that the placebo group experienced greater increases in muscle mass and muscle quality than the metformin group.”
The investigators randomized 109 healthy volunteers at UAB and UK with an average age of 69. Roughly half took 1700 mg of metformin per day, while the other half took placebo pills identical in appearance. Following baseline testing, both groups completed 14 weeks of resistance training. Before and after the exercise period, both groups underwent thigh CT scans, DXA measurement, strength testing and a thigh muscle biopsy.
“DXA and CT scans showed that the placebo group had greater gains in overall lean muscle mass and thigh muscle mass,” said Peterson. “CT scans and analysis of the biopsy also allowed us to determine that the quality of the muscle improved in the control group over the metformin group.”
The research team originally hypothesized that metformin would improve exercise response by targeting macrophages, immune cells present in muscle.
“The premise was that metformin would alter macrophage metabolism, converting them from an inflammatory to a reparative phenotype through activation of a kinase called AMPK,” said Dr. Philip Kern, director of the UK Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences. “This should then enhance the effect of resistance training in older adults.”
“Although metformin activated AMPK, the increase in reparative macrophages with training was comparable between groups. However, AMPK is also known to inhibit another kinase in muscle fibers, mTORC1,” Peterson said. “mTORC1 is a key regulator of muscle growth. Metformin’s inhibition of that pathway is likely the reason that the metformin group did not see the same gains in muscle mass as the control group.”
“Progressive resistance exercise training remains the one intervention that we know will boost muscle gain in seniors, however, we also know that not all people respond to exercise to the same degree,” Bamman said. “For those low responders to resistance training, it might be beneficial to have an adjunct that would boost their response and enhance their gains. But clearly metformin isn’t the one.”
The study was funded by the National Institute on Aging and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The Centers for Clinical and Translational Sciences at UK and UAB were instrumental in conducting the study.
Additional authors from the University of Kentucky are R. Grace Walton, Cory M. Dungan, Douglas E. Long, Kate Kosmac and Bailey D. Peck, Center for Muscle Biology; Heather M. Bush, Department of Biostatics; and Alejandro G. Villasante Tezanos, Department of Statistics.
Additional authors from UAB are S. Craig Tuggle, Center for Exercise Medicine; Gerald McGwin, Department of Epidemiology; Samuel T. Windham, Department of Surgery; and Fernando Ovalle, Department of Medicine.
As the state’s flagship, land-grant institution, the University of Kentucky exists to advance the Commonwealth. We do that by preparing the next generation of leaders — placing students at the heart of everything we do — and transforming the lives of Kentuckians through education, research and creative work, service and health care. We pride ourselves on being a catalyst for breakthroughs and a force for healing, a place where ingenuity unfolds. It's all made possible by our people — visionaries, disruptors and pioneers — who make up 200 academic programs, a $501 million research and development enterprise and a world-class medical center, all on one campus.
In 2022, UK was ranked by Forbes as one of the “Best Employers for New Grads” and named a “Diversity Champion” by INSIGHT into Diversity, a testament to our commitment to advance Kentucky and create a community of belonging for everyone. While our mission looks different in many ways than it did in 1865, the vision of service to our Commonwealth and the world remains the same. We are the University for Kentucky.